RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Brady Ducks The Bouncer

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Muadib
    replied
    Presence in meetings does not determine legal representation...

    Yuh case nuh look suh good..

    Leave a comment:


  • Don1
    replied
    yuh ah one tribalist...i.e. ... not someone to be taken seriously

    Leave a comment:


  • Lazie
    replied
    Originally posted by Time View Post
    The fact that he signed the document at the time that he did is more important that anything said once trouble came knocking.
    Troubling for who? The man admitted he wasn't a consultant and he wasn't working on behalf of the gov't. I guess that nuh fit inna the plot.

    Leave a comment:


  • Time
    replied
    Originally posted by Lazie View Post
    .. the fact that Brady indicated that represenation was wrong goes out the window because it nuh fit the plot?
    The fact that he signed the document at the time that he did is more important that anything said once trouble came knocking.

    Leave a comment:


  • Time
    replied
    Originally posted by Maudib View Post
    Has Mannat provided evidence of their claim ???

    *jeapordy music*
    MPP presence at certain meetings between the US and Ja Goverment in which would only have been possible if MPP was representing the gov is good enough evidence.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lazie
    replied
    Originally posted by Don1 View Post
    man fi fool ...but nuh suh
    Sorry comrade, but I don't see the need to dismiss facts because I don't want to hear it.

    Leave a comment:


  • myYout
    replied
    or leave ah lone, ball jus outside di off stump, pad up ah mek it gwaan.

    Leave a comment:


  • Don1
    replied
    Originally posted by Lazie View Post
    .. the fact that Brady indicated that represenation was wrong goes out the window because it nuh fit the plot?
    man fi fool ...but nuh suh

    Leave a comment:


  • Don1
    replied
    lol

    Leave a comment:


  • Lazie
    replied
    Originally posted by Time View Post
    They can show in many ways that MPP represented the govt. This is what really matters. There is also a FARA document signed by Brady & MPP showing that MPP was representing the GOJ through Harold Brady.
    .. the fact that Brady indicated that represenation was wrong goes out the window because it nuh fit the plot?

    Leave a comment:


  • Muadib
    replied
    Oh well.. more money for election campaign as far as I see it...

    PNP have dem Bi-election legal fees tactics
    JLP have dem FINSAC enquiry and now this..

    Lawyah dem run di wirl it look like..

    Meanwhile dem have common people like Don1 and Mosiah jumping up and down with false hope...

    Leave a comment:


  • Muadib
    replied
    Has Mannat provided evidence of their claim ???

    *jeapordy music*

    Leave a comment:


  • Gamma
    replied
    to see if it can be demonstrated i guess ..... this is all evidence driven ... well, it should be at any rate.

    Leave a comment:


  • Time
    replied
    Originally posted by Maudib View Post
    So then.. if no-one can demonstrate that the Govt hired Brady.. what is this all about ?
    They can show in many ways that MPP represented the govt. This is what really matters. There is also a FARA document signed by Brady & MPP showing that MPP was representing the GOJ through Harold Brady.

    Leave a comment:


  • Muadib
    replied
    I am in a discussion with my attorney.. please to excuse yuhself !

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X