Biography TV, Dudus Full Episode

[Don1]

I don't know who is this Mr Williams you refer to.... so I'm unaware of any circumstances of his supposed protection...feel free fi mek mi know

As to my views of Smith's allegations (via audio recording) ...this was discussed a likkle while ago and I did comment at the time:

Suh mek wi bruk dis dung...

Wi ave one convicted criminal tief alleging dat:

1. Im fund Bunting opponent wid di tiefin money cause im fraid if Bunting win...im criminal enterprise inna big worries

2. Tru im fund Bunting opponent Skeng mek im know seh im agguh tun im inna ghost

3. Im intention was fi JLP win suh im gi dem a long bag ah im tiefin money...presumably JLP dem more "business-friendly" i.e. dem wudda mek im gwaan duh im criminal ting. Termites originally get ongly one deggehdeggeh US$500K ah di said tiefin money fi nuh mek it look suh bad

4. Im ketch im fraid fi Skeng... an PJ mek im know dat if im gi di Termite dem ah nex US$1M evvyting kriss...i.e. PJ broker one Termite protection policy

Hmmmmm....dis is one noice likkle slice of JLPNP corruption.... wi dun know di whole cake is why wi inna dis mess

[Comment]

Really stupid statement to make by Bunting on Babylon air...showing his political naivete....Notwithstanding the impression many (including this poster ) have that the statement is entirely correct.

One Liad & Daft Dottie Darkburn were definitely manipulating the AG Office to protect JLP interests...to the detriment of Jamaica's...that's pretty clear to all but JLP tribalists like Lazie

Pity those sanctimonious JLP misleaders quoted in the article didn't note that the really damaging element of this Babylon TV production is the increased & justified international perception that the One Liad led JA Govt protected a criminal terrorist for 9 months...then warned him of impending extradition...then oversaw police/military action which led to ~75 persons being killed...some in apparent extra-judicial circumstances. After all that the terrorist is captured cross-dressed, in the company of a JLP activist

Compared with that international calamity...Bunting's intemperate statement is merely anedda Tempest inna Teacup

Bunting is many things...but naive is not one of them...he knew what he was saying and he knew who he was talking to...you know...the self proclaimed impressionable Dons!.. and people like him...

BTW...talking about sanctimonious miss-leaders...where is A certain Mr. Williams, and who is protecting him?
And what do you think about Mr. Smith's allegations regarding a certain Mr. Bunting and Mr. Patterson and Mr. Skengie?

[Don1]

when dem come fi di eediat dem yuh fuss wi know ...wooooiiieee

[Sir X]

Yuh leff off they came for the druggist.....Boss dem come fi socialist long time (IMF) ..Trade unionist (IMF)....and YOU LABOURITE (IMF) .

Wha leff fi dem come fah , yuh nuh ear seh wi bruk...bout constitution ,dat only play fi elitist , when dem feel like it.

WE HAVE NONE !

[Gamma]

And you direct answer to my direct question is?

[Don1]

Oh yuh di grow up inna one PNP household?? Mi neva know

Congrats

[Karl]

Which is likely to cause more harm to the jlp? Letting it go or contesting it?

Is either scenario likely to be detrimental to JAMAICA? If so which?

The utterances or the response of the jlp to the utterances?

Finally, what would you do if you were the subject of such a statement and you considered it to be false?

If it were false...?
...but was it?

Something caused Likle Brucie to do a 360 and then disappear!!!
A wah?

[Lazie]

Tap yuh yappin.

Your puny likkle brain cannot comprehend what I would complain about in any given hypothetical situation

Growing up in a PNP household your dandy shandy moves are predictable.

[Don1]

Tap yuh yappin.

Your puny likkle brain cannot comprehend what I would complain about in any given hypothetical situation

[Lazie]

Yes that's why One Liad should have submitted the matter to the Courts for a ruling on the extradition issue and/or theand recused himself ESPECIALLY since he has a personal/political relationship wid "Chris"... mek di Courts decide on any illegalities or not

Instead dat eediat Golding choose fi fight Babylon on behalf of Jamaica's biggest ever criminal with ALL the perceptions of his political involvement wid said criminal telegraphed for the entire Whirl to see

Man fi fool ...but nuh suh

... And when the courts throw it out then you same one would complain that the govt violated a citizen rights?

[Don1]

Yes that's why One Liad should have submitted the matter to the Courts for a ruling on the extradition issue and recused himself... ESPECIALLY since he had a personal/political relationship wid "Chris"... mek di Courts decide on any illegalities or not. One Liad dealing wid dat wudden pass di political smell test

Instead dat eediat Golding choose fi fight Babylon on behalf of Jamaica's biggest ever criminal with ALL the conflict of interest perceptions of his political involvement wid said criminal telegraphed for the entire Whirl to see

Man fi fool ...but nuh suh

[Lazie]

Seriously Brick , who cares ?

That is it X, don't care.

First they came for the communists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.

Then they came for the socialists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a socialist.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.

Then they came for me,
and there was no one left to speak for me.

[Bricktop]

I want my government to fight against ALL illegal extraditions...alleged reprobate or not

[Don1]

Suppose yuh innocent and dem kidnap yuh like dem kidnap di yute in Ochi? Den what? Yuh have couple years a yuh life to lose because Merica decide fi wipe dem b@tty wit our constitution?

Now dat would be concerning!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ring di Alarm fi dat an tell Babylon fi guhwey!!!!

All fi mi dawg wudda deh pon di frontline wid im sign: WE WANT JUSTICE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Bricktop]

Suppose yuh innocent and dem kidnap yuh like dem kidnap di yute in Ochi? Den what? Yuh have couple years a yuh life to lose because Merica decide fi wipe dem b@tty wit our constitution?