RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Balla and Tilla, what unuh think of these Chelsea articles?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Balla and Tilla, what unuh think of these Chelsea articles?

    or should I say, CSKA London,:P

    Ahead of United's November 26th meeting with the evil that is Chel$ki, RANT infiltrated Roman Abramovich's plaything to bring you a tale of dull football, corporate fans and a jobby in the corporate hospitality suite. OK well maybe not the last bit - what do you think we are, Scousers?

    Never one to turn down a free lunch RANT accepted a benefactor's offer of a gratis ticket and 'hospitality' at CSKA London's Carling Cup match with Aston O'Villa at Stamford Bridge. First dining on over-cooked beef and Morrison's own-brand gravy, washed down with ****-week Carlsberg, our mission was to leave a 'gift' in the director's box. Erm, we mean scout the Old Trafford's next opposition.

    The game itself was as expected, pretty dull. There was no surprise in finding Chelsea playing some of the most uninspiring, functional football this side of George Graham's Arsenal. Despite the 4-0 scoreline there was little creativity on show and even less entertainment. The Londoners were up to their usual tricks; Drogba rolled around on the grass all night, Lampard played square balls while still pretending that he's not just a poor man's Darren Fletcher and the referee gave his favourite side all the decisions. Amazing how brown envelopes concentrate the mind.

    To think we complained about Ferguson's 4-5-1. Saffy you are forgiven!

    During the match Chel$ki 'fans' occasionally burst into chants of Blue Day or One Man Went To Mow. Original it was not. RANT has learnt a painful lesson and never again should complain about the atmosphere at Old Trafford after witnessing these Eurovision song-contest nil-pointers masquerade as football supporters.

    Yet for all the home fans' faults and the dull football on offer, the South London club will make formidable opponents in two weeks time. Their tactical plan of keeping it very tight at the back and then hitting long balls to Drogba, works. While there is no width or flair to the Chelsea game there is a powerful midfield engine room that could take control at Old Trafford should the Gaffer cave into to his inner demons and field Fletcher and/or O'Shea. United's midfield shouldn't attempt to outfight Chel$ki but outpass them as surely Scholes, Carrick, Ronaldo and Giggs can.

    And for once the nation will be with United when Abramovich's meat wagon rolls into town. Universal hatred of the Rent Boys appears to have descended like a tsunami onto Stamford Bridge. From the manager's laughable complaining and the vulgar amounts of money spent on players, to their underhand transfer tactics and pitch-doctoring, everybody has a reason to treat this small club near Fulham with the contempt they deserve.

    The Barcelona affair, for example, was dirty, disrespectful and childish. Ferguson v Wenger never sank to the depths that Mourinho is prepared lower himself to. It is to Frank Rijkaard's eternal credit that he remained dignified throughout. The latest Chelsea episode came at the weekend, with the almost constant barracking of the officials by Terry & Co. This culminated in Mourinho's captain refusing to head to the dressing rooms after a humiliating Red card. A lengthy ban must surely follow, for both the dismissal and the subsequent (in)action. Has the arrogance of money and success led Chelsea's players, management and board to believe that they are above the law?

    'Hypocrisy' I hear the plastics cry. Well no, because after the vein pumping chasing of referee Andy D'Urso in the 2001 Middlesbrough v United match at Old Trafford, Ferguson laid down the law. Never again were United players guilty of hounding referees and even Rooney now realises that there's a minimum level of respect he must adhere to.

    Chelsea, on the other hand, believe that they are eternally right or, worse, that it doesn't matter if they are wrong. After all what's the FA going to do about it? Fines for the club or players are meaningless. The authorities can't even ban players because Chelsea has the depth to cope with 11 internationals being
    "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

  • #2
    RE: Balla and Tilla, what unuh think of these Chelsea articles?

    .. at least unuh mek this author happy!

    Life is all the sweeter after Chelsea's Portillo moment

    Monday morning, and the world shines anew. Grown men skip down the street, pensioners raise their walking sticks in solidarity, babies gurgle contentedly, unseasonal birds tweet the Internationale. "Lovely day!" says the man selling tickets at the Tube station. I don't think I've seen him smile before. If the much missed Paul Foot were still around he'd doubtless be quoting Shelley:

    Rise like lions after slumber

    In unvanquishable number

    Shake your chains to earth like dew

    Which in sleep had fallen on you -

    Ye are many - they are few.

    Yes, dear reader, the massed ranks have won and Chelsea have lost. Such optimism has not been felt since May 2 1997, and the first day of New Labour.

    Bob, a Spurs fan of many years standing, is hoarse from shouting. "It's like we won the league," he croaks. Ben, another fan, says he's trying to play it cool, but the idiot grin gives him away. Meanwhile, at a local school where I help out, a young boy in a wheelchair and Chelsea top rolls past, his head lowered dejectedly. Anne, the head teacher, slaps him on the back. "Unlucky, mate," she shouts joyously. And she's not even a Spurs fan. (Orient, seeing you ask.)

    Every underdog has it day. Charlton, Sheffield United, Watford - unbelievably, the bottom three all won over one weekend. And West Ham beat Arsenal. Great stuff. But not, of course, as great as Tottenham's epic victory over Chelsea.

    In the past, this newspaper has been accused of being anti-Chelsea. While I'm sure it's not true of my more esteemed colleagues, I wish to state categorically that I would never attempt to bring objectivity to my analysis of the club. Truth is I'm so biased that I find it hard to admit Didier Drogba is having a decent season or Claude Makelele hit his goal sweetly on Sunday.

    My prejudice knows no bounds. I detest Chelsea. I despise everything about their soul-destroying, peasant-plundering, oil-pimping, wallet-waving, pitch-ruining, ref-abusing, knee-falling, opponent-cussing ways. I despise the fact that they have made me a bigot. I despise the fact that I get more pleasure from seeing Chelsea lose than Manchester City win. I despise the fact that I'd rather Manchester United won the Premiership than Chelsea. I despise the fact that I tick off every week Andriy Shevchenko doesn't score a goal as another victory for the unmoneyed majority. I despise the fact that I take pleasure in Shaun Wright-Phillips having never scored for Chelsea despite the fact that I once loved him so tenderly. I despise the fact that I take comfort in the belief that Chelsea are getting worse and worse - two seasons ago they lost once in the league, last season twice, and less than a third of the way through the season they have already been beaten twice. I despise the fact that I know the word schadenfreude means something akin to bitter, vengeful bastard.

    Yet I know I'm not alone. The line between nihilism and idealism is often a blurred one - indeed the original Nihilists were an idealistic, if violent, Russian revolutionary movement. And there are many others out there who share my contempt for Chelsea and hope that Tottenham's victory could herald a brave new world in which Nottingham Forest will win the Premiership after two successive promotions, Oxford United clinch the Carling Cup and AFC Wimbledon run off with the FA Cup.

    Back in 1997, of course, we were not so much celebrating the emergence of Tony Blair as rejoicing at the end of the Tories. There was springtime sun, elation at new beginnings and a conviction that free-market madness was at an end. Similarly with Spurs.

    Where were you when Portillo fell in 1997? Where were you for Spurs-Chelsea in 2006? Only this time it's autumn sun stoking up the elation. All the omens are there. Just as England's football team enjoyed a "historic" victory over Italy in 1997, this current England team are unbeaten in almost a month and enjoyed a historic victory over Andorra; a
    "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

    Comment


    • #3
      RE: Balla and Tilla, what unuh think of these Chelsea articles?

      Even an idiot have a right to their opinion

      Comment


      • #4
        RE: Balla and Tilla, what unuh think of these Chelsea articles?

        Idiot? hehehe! Look like dem touch a nerve.
        "Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)

        Comment

        Working...
        X