Tweet
...X yuh betta not show yuh face round here tiddeh...life flipping sweet...
-
-
Bwoy! ...GUNNERS dominated possession in their 3 matches and only picked up 4 points. --- Those 5 dropped would have had us comfortable with 41 points!
Aaaaaah bwoy
..life not so sweet!
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has." -
Hush Karl...dem tief we out wit a offside goal too...so it guh...Comment
-
is TH14 fault!
Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas PaineComment
-
a whey the @#&* a gwaan yah so....... Xcuse mouth worsera than goat to rhatid!!!! It is guaranteed that if X recommends a team, they are sure to lose. Xcuse you are 0 to 10000000000000000000000000000000000000. Give up the prediction business.
Frigging incompetentS.
Hey .. look at the bright side .... at least you're not a Liverpool fan! - Lazie 2/24/10
Paul Marin -19 is one thing, 20 is a whole other matter. It gets even worse if they win the UCL. *groan*. 
05/18/2011.MU fans naah cough, but all a unuh a vomit?-Lazie 1/11/2015Comment
-
Originally posted by Jangle View Posta whey the @#&* a gwaan yah so....... Xcuse mouth worsera than goat to rhatid!!!! It is guaranteed that if X recommends a team, they are sure to lose. Xcuse you are 0 to 10000000000000000000000000000000000000. Give up the prediction business. Frigging incompetentS.
Look at the first goal ... clearly dem a Kamikaze ... in order fi stop the defending champs."Jamaica's future reflects its past, having attained only one per cent annual growth over 30 years whilst neighbours have grown at five per cent." (Article)Comment
-
6 dem getting too...so yuh can figget bout goal difference...life flippin sweet...
Comment
-
suh yuh sacrifice holness fi man city!!!!
Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas PaineComment
-
.
Comment
-
I see you peeking X...peek a boo...
Comment
-
Di man over di next side a di board a keep up long argument when him side a plunge to defeat...ahahaahahahahahahahah...I told you to watch your mouth son...Comment
-
Couldn't agree more...well, kinda. I am not upset about the result in the macro sense (i.e. what it means to the title race), but very upset in the micro-sense (our team's performance generally).Originally posted by Lazie View Post
Liverpool has no goal scorers and our build up is great until the last 25 yards. It took us 88 minutes before we got some level of possession inside the 6 yard box. That can't continue. Time to break out the checkbook.
By the way, the Suarez ban was not contested as it was an easy way for KK to justify buying another striker and not spooking the poor hapless Andy Carroll, who I believe will eventually come good, for Wolves.
It is his way of saving face for a poor decision (spending 35M on Carroll - same amount City spend for Kun) in the last January window.
"H.L & Brick .....mi deh pan di wagon (Man City)" - X_____ http://www.reggaeboyzsc.com/forum1/showthread.php?p=378365&highlight=City+Liverpool#p ost378365
X DESCRIBES HIMSELF - Stop masquerading as if you have the clubs interest at heart, you are a fraud, always was and always will be in any and every thing that you present...Comment
-
The decision not to contest the ban is also to save face. The written decision is pretty damning. I see Suarez still focused on the word "negro" which is not really the point. He was taunting the man using it in a derogatory way.
I would be interested to see a black man accusing another black man of being racist for calling him "ma nig•ah" in a heated quarrel and what a tribunal would say about
Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas PaineComment
-
Gamma - how do you know he was using it in a derogatory way? He denies that and the only "evidence" to refute it is Evra's testimony. This was not a factor (see below) as I understand it.Originally posted by Gamma View Post
Secondly, based on the report, the word "n-g-r" in and of itself is abusive and insulting, so based on this precedent, it makes no difference who is using the word, whether they are black or white. Specifically, paragraph 72 of the report reads:
72. Rule E3(2) provides that in the event of any breach of Rule E3(1) including a reference to, amongst other things, a person's ethnic origin, colour or race, a Commission shall consider the imposition of an increased sanction. The wording of Rule E3(2) is clear. It is a question of fact whether a breach of Rule E3(1) includes a reference to the protected characteristics.
No question of subjective intention arises here."H.L & Brick .....mi deh pan di wagon (Man City)" - X_____ http://www.reggaeboyzsc.com/forum1/showthread.php?p=378365&highlight=City+Liverpool#p ost378365
X DESCRIBES HIMSELF - Stop masquerading as if you have the clubs interest at heart, you are a fraud, always was and always will be in any and every thing that you present...Comment
-
Were they have tea in the garden? Just look back at the incident without knowing what was said and look at the body language.
Infidelity does not consist in believing, or in disbelieving; it consists in professing to believe what he does not believe. Thomas PaineComment
Comment