Originally posted by Lionpaw
					
						
						
							
							
							
							
								
								
								
								
									View Post
								
							
						
					
				
				
			
		RBSC
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	Announcement
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	
		
			
				No announcement yet.
				
			
				
	
Ibra's goal was better than this. REALLY!!!
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	X
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 
 Comment
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 After an intense analysis, my "official" (my word is final and should end all debates) conclusion is - Trevor Sinclair's goal is a better goal. He had a defender on his back; the ball was travelling at a faster speed; he is kicking against/across the direction that the ball was travelling which meant that he had to time his kick to perfection; he had to climb higher to meet the ball. Ibra anticipated Joe Hart's header and had a pretty decent idea of where he was positioned from the goal. Plus he had more time to wait on the ball to fall before he went up for the bicyle kick. It was a great goal still, but Sinclair's was better.Hey .. look at the bright side .... at least you're not a Liverpool fan! - Lazie 2/24/10 Paul Marin -19 is one thing, 20 is a whole other matter. It gets even worse if they win the UCL. *groan*. Paul Marin -19 is one thing, 20 is a whole other matter. It gets even worse if they win the UCL. *groan*. 05/18/2011.MU fans naah cough, but all a unuh a vomit?-Lazie 1/11/2015 05/18/2011.MU fans naah cough, but all a unuh a vomit?-Lazie 1/11/2015
 Comment
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 That usually increases the level of difficulty. Those of us who play sports know this.Originally posted by Jangle View PostAfter an intense analysis, my "official" (my word is final and should end all debates) conclusion is - Trevor Sinclair's goal is a better goal. He had a defender on his back; the ball was travelling at a faster speed; he is kicking against/across the direction that the ball was travelling which meant that he had to time his kick to perfection; he had to climb higher to meet the ball. Ibra anticipated Joe Hart's header and had a pretty decent idea of where he was positioned from the goal. Plus he had more time to wait on the ball to fall before he went up for the bicyle kick. It was a great goal still, but Sinclair's was better.
 Comment
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Weh yuh trying to seh bighead....yuh waan see me credentials?Hey .. look at the bright side .... at least you're not a Liverpool fan! - Lazie 2/24/10 Paul Marin -19 is one thing, 20 is a whole other matter. It gets even worse if they win the UCL. *groan*. Paul Marin -19 is one thing, 20 is a whole other matter. It gets even worse if they win the UCL. *groan*. 05/18/2011.MU fans naah cough, but all a unuh a vomit?-Lazie 1/11/2015 05/18/2011.MU fans naah cough, but all a unuh a vomit?-Lazie 1/11/2015
 Comment
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Originally posted by Jangle View PostAfter an intense analysis, my "official" (my word is final and should end all debates) conclusion is - Trevor Sinclair's goal is a better goal. He had a defender on his back; the ball was travelling at a faster speed; he is kicking against/across the direction that the ball was travelling which meant that he had to time his kick to perfection; he had to climb higher to meet the ball. Ibra anticipated Joe Hart's header and had a pretty decent idea of where he was positioned from the goal. Plus he had more time to wait on the ball to fall before he went up for the bicyle kick. It was a great goal still, but Sinclair's was better.
 Upon further review, I have to go with Jangle. Sinclair's goal was definitely better. To add to Jangle's analysis, Sinclair also had to beat the keeper; the keeper had already been beaten when Ibra took his shot.
 Comment



Comment