Bullead : He continues to agitate with FOOTBALL SENSE!

[Rockman]

Were you paying attention, do you think I was ducking your post even though I explained why I did not respond in a timely manner?
Was the other time(s) you alluded to a mere figment of your imagination too?
The arrogance, Sir X.

[Sir X]

Another ball missed ,question not answered , again ,credit and presidency ?

[Rockman]

You bordered on cowing down all his critics during the period in question, even you can have oversights, certainly knowing that will make you refrain from wrongfully labeling someone with opposing views.

[Sir X]

Its not the 1st you went hiding under a Rock or quiet as a Rock, is that why you chose the moniker, of note you havent answered my questions, you can change it to dandy shandy.

There is no debate as to Ricketts shortcomings or whether he deserves criticism,I am the main poster of his plethroa of bunglings.That said can you answer my question about giving credit and the presidency.

[Rockman]

Sir X, this is yet another rare instance of you displaying immaturity, I was preoccupied doing something else ergo I am seeing your post for the first time.
It is rather peculiar that you would label me anti Ricketts (that is motivation to criticize him)when it is abudantly clear that he is derelict and therefore deserving of criticism.
Warped perspective, well the same as it pertains to The Agent.
How dare we see......

[Sir X]

The Rock gets silent,typical.Proof he is on a antii Ricketts/Bullead campaign,where credit is not derserved even if earned, and any who spout such views are persona non grata.

[Sir X]

Rock ,if Ricketts implements a coaching agenda like what I and others have long advocated for ,the ( A) standard ! Would you give him credit ? Would it be enough to advocate for his presidency?

[Sir X]

Really,most of the negative news about Ricketts is posted on the site by me,and the same with positive news.The credit I give him seems to be an issue with some here.Its as if I should be on a negative campaign against Ricketts, as if he needs help.

[Rockman]

Now you are putting the cart before the horse, he is the President, and that does not absolve him of constructive criticisms.
Those criticisms were not well met by you.

[Sir X]

Yes Sir,I gave him credit,not an endorsement for the JFF presidency.That is possible, is it ?

[Rockman]

Come up for some air, Sir X.
People were critical of Ricjetts when yoy were painstakingly looking to give him credit, in hindsight, your input was not helpful.

[Sir X]

You call giving Ricketts credit an endorsement, are you conflating that with his presidency to score a low blow as me being a hypocrite?

If Bullead wants to use his granny as an example, I have no issue,if the granny makes the point.

Yes he isn't the only one with gripes,but he agitates for progressive change and that is a difference,where most offer none.That change means standards must be met and that burden falls on the JFF and if it cant be met ,the head of it risk the chance of others campaigning to meet them ,which means a change in presidency.

Finally any endorsement that you perceive I have for Ricketts is at odds with any campaign to meet that coaching agenda.

[Rockman]

He would have been better off not referencing his two sons, but I am sure that was unnoticed by you.
Coaching accreditation is one thing and players development is another as it pertains to Whitmore.
In other words, Whitmore is working with what he has(his players should have already developed), it is the JFF fault.
Also, let us revisit the heated debate you had with Jawge regarding schoolboy football, whose perspective is the progressive one?
Agent Provocateur has a valid point, he muddies it by pursuing personal agendas such as getting his son Kyle to walk into our starting lineup, the plugin flew right over your head.
He is not the only one with a gripe..., Cedella Marley.., obtw, wasn't the coach of the ReggaeGirlz a holder of all the required credentials yet they were derailed by JFF dereliction?
A comprehensive approach is needed, Sir X.
And please stop calling people hypocrites, did you not endorse Ricketts insomuch that you insisted that we gave him credit right up until it became abundantly clear that he was an abject failure .
One can draw parallels with your adulation with Agent Provocateur, whose relevance, at one point, you attributed to the good of having a healthy democratic process, and now this .

[Sir X]

Hypocrite

Your previous positions were its overrated where experience as player coach is enough, unaffordable, to now a goal to be achieved in vague terms.Having a forgein coach to teach,really who else would teach it ?

[OJ]

His general points are not new to the site and had been stated here before. I think I stated that is why I would have a foreign TD to teach the coaches. The message is fine nothing against the messenger.