RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Uh Ohh Time Fi Ban Churches

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Hortical
    replied
    A sistren of mine who go one a dem Anglican churches in Jamaica tell mi sey nuff a the priests dem a sodomites and mi would not be surprised if a similar scandal to what tek place in the Catholic church blow up in the near future.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bricktop
    replied
    Originally posted by Lazie View Post

    Anyway, I found out the priest was found in the nude.
    Just now yuh find out? Di priest a b@ttyman but di bredda a b@ttyman to bout him a hold man penis in him hand fi three minutes. The point is man a bun dancehall den go kneel down inna church

    Leave a comment:


  • Lazie
    replied
    Originally posted by Bricktop View Post
    Lazie, is everybody lying when dem seh father touch dem? Is it a worldwide conspiracy gainst the church?
    Never said that, I simply asked a question. Sane defendants have claimed insanity in order to beat a murder charge, so isn't it possible the defendant could be twisting the truth to be found not guilty knowing the tolerance level of most Jamaicans when it comes to homosexuality?

    Anyway, I found out the priest was found in the nude.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bricktop
    replied
    What? Di man guilty as sin what does that have to do with di fact di priest a b@ttyman?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mosiah
    replied
    Tenk God yuh nuh deh pon di jury. Yuh woulden need fi 'ear anyting.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bricktop
    replied
    Originally posted by Lazie View Post
    Yuh reach that conclusion based on that testimony? What if the defendant is lying to save himself?
    Lazie, is everybody lying when dem seh father touch dem? Is it a worldwide conspiracy gainst the church?

    Leave a comment:


  • Islandman
    replied
    LOL, you is a real comedian.

    You have a problem with our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ? You don't believe that Adam and Eve was riding around on Barney back in the day?

    Leave a comment:


  • Lazie
    replied
    Originally posted by Bricktop View Post
    Mi nuh business what happen between two b@ttyman but man waan ban Dancehall because man a cuss badwud wha bout di church? Dem a unleash b@ttyman pon people and unnuh go deh every Sunday go eat bread fropm hand whe a stroke off man. Sorry fi unnuh
    Yuh reach that conclusion based on that testimony? What if the defendant is lying to save himself?

    Leave a comment:


  • Bricktop
    replied
    Mi nuh business what happen between two b@ttyman but man waan ban Dancehall because man a cuss badwud wha bout di church? Dem a unleash b@ttyman pon people and unnuh go deh every Sunday go eat bread from hand whe a stroke off man. Sorry fi unnuh
    Last edited by Bricktop; January 9, 2009, 03:17 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mosiah
    replied
    So, what do you think happened, Brickie?

    Leave a comment:


  • Lazie
    replied
    Dead men tell no tales. If the priest did make advances on him before, why keep going back there? It would be good to know what the priest was wearing when he was killed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bricktop
    started a topic Uh Ohh Time Fi Ban Churches

    Uh Ohh Time Fi Ban Churches

    Now let's see how the RBSC TALIBAN manages to "hypocrite" dem way outta dis one

    PRIEST'S FREAKY ACTS EXPOSED - Court hears accused pressured for sex

    The details of the alleged intimate acts that took place between a priest and the man accused of murdering him were revealed yesterday in a document which was tendered in evidence and read to the jury.

    The revelation was made during the trial of 25-year-old labourer Prince Vale of Tommy Hill district, Stony Hill, St Andrew, who is charged with the murder of Anglican priest Father Richard Johnson.

    The priest was fatally stabbed on the night of November 12, 2006, at the Anglican church rectory at Stony Hill.

    Deputy Superintendent Roy Boyd testified in the Home Circuit Court yesterday that on November 15, 2006, he interviewed Vale. He said attorney-at-law Arthur Kitchin represented Vale during the interview that was in the form of questions and answers.

    Vale said he used to go to the priest's house and they would discuss work and Bible knowledge. He said that they would telephone each other as well.

    Vale said during the interview, that on previous occasions when he went to the rectory, he and the priest watched television in the bedroom. He said they also watched 'blue movies'.

    Questioned as to whether the priest had ever said anything to him about having sex, Vale said "yes". The accused man further said that the priest had asked him if mi could have sex with him, which he refused.

    Vale told the police during the interview that on the night of the incident he went to the priest's house sometime after 9 p.m for a pair of pants and to discuss work.

    He said that when he went to the house, the priest let him in. He said that he asked the priest for a drink and it was given to him.

    After he tried on the pair of pants, it could not fit and he told the priest it would be better for him to keep it.

    He said that after he took off the pants the priest tried to fondle him. Father Johnson, he said, touched his penis and chest but "I told him I was not in those things".

    Vale said that the priest who was wearing a pair of shorts took it off and tried to make him touch his erect penis. Questioned further Vale said "mi put mi hand on it." Vale said that for about three to five minutes, the priest was trying to have intercourse with him but he told him to stop.

    In response to the question "why did you stab Johnson?" Vale replied "mi never want him to ..... me." Vale said at the time when he stabbed the priest he had been lying on top of him.
Working...
X