RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What a letter!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Don1
    replied
    Originally posted by Willi View Post
    Yes it is,

    If all you have is the allegation of a desperate madman.

    I am not saying NOT to investigate, but one does not normally do so based on the grumbling of such people.

    Mouth mek fi sah anything.

    I too a arguing hypothetically.
    Ok.. you consider the hypothetical question regarding Golding & Smith meeting.. an unreasonable one ... so you can't respond to it.

    In that alleged situation.. I would find such a meeting to be horrible and requiring further investigation to get to the root of the matter. Golding meeting with an alleged international fraudster?
    That would be very significant... and not in a positive way.

    Let's leave it at that.
    Last edited by Don1; July 11, 2009, 09:31 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Willi
    replied
    Yes it is,

    If all you have is the allegation of a desperate madman.

    I am not saying NOT to investigate, but one does not normally do so based on the grumbling of such people.

    Mouth mek fi sah anything.

    I too a arguing hypothetically.

    Leave a comment:


  • Don1
    replied
    Originally posted by Maudib View Post
    Did Bruce meet with David Smith while he was under investigation ?
    mi nuh kno im diary Rear Admiral... chek fi wi nuh? Wi need di elp.

    Please?

    Leave a comment:


  • Don1
    replied
    Originally posted by Maudib View Post
    Do you have proof to the contrary ?
    Mi nuh du nuh research Rear Admiral... mi jus ave mi memry... mi really cudda wrang fi tru... suh mi naah fite yuh ..... dis time.

    But nuh yu seh yuh ave proof... mek wi seet nuh?

    Please???

    Leave a comment:


  • Muadib
    replied
    Do you have proof to the contrary ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Don1
    replied
    Originally posted by Maudib View Post
    The fact is you are an idiot.

    Our argument had to do with the CONTRACT OLINT has with its members and whether or not anyting was GUARANTEED.

    Run along now fraud.
    Idiot?? Fraud?? Whaapen Rear Admiral... how yuh vex suh? Ah wha?

    Bad day at the trough? Cyaa admit seh yu wrang?

    Yuh seh yu ave proof.... mek we seet nuh?

    Duh!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Muadib
    replied
    Did Bruce meet with David Smith while he was under investigation ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Muadib
    replied
    The fact is you are an idiot.

    Our argument had to do with the CONTRACT OLINT has with its members and whether or not anyting was GUARANTEED.

    Run along now fraud.

    Leave a comment:


  • Don1
    replied
    Originally posted by Willi View Post
    Yuh have PROOF of the meeting or just the ranting of this madman?

    THAT is my point.
    The man seems to be willing to say ANYTHING to further his misguided personal cause. I speaks to credibility.
    Willi that's not for me to prove... not my job... as I said media should be ferreting that out... it should not be difficult... about 28 people live pon di Turks... an di whole ah dem ah fambily.

    My question is a hypothetical one... if Golding did meet with the fellow a few weeks ago... what would be your reaction?

    Not too difficult or unreasonable a question is it?

    Leave a comment:


  • Don1
    replied
    Originally posted by Maudib View Post
    But mi nuh unnastan dem breddah..

    Dem claim people Naive bout OLINT Ponzi scheme.. den dem nuh have dem facts ???

    Yuh mout set pon spring...

    Yuh bettah wispah di request.. Poor Don1.. foot in mouth yet again...

    di likkle man still ah chat farrt... im caan deal wid di fax... but ah wha dis faada? dawg nyam im suppa LOL!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Willi
    replied
    Yuh have PROOF of the meeting or just the ranting of this madman?

    THAT is my point.
    The man seems to be willing to say ANYTHING to further his misguided personal cause. I speaks to credibility.

    Leave a comment:


  • Willi
    replied
    Whose perception???

    Yuh think dem free to harrass people just suh.

    You must have probable cause.

    Leave a comment:


  • Muadib
    replied
    But mi nuh unnastan dem breddah..

    Dem claim people Naive bout OLINT Ponzi scheme.. den dem nuh have dem facts ???

    Yuh mout set pon spring...

    Yuh bettah wispah di request.. Poor Don1.. foot in mouth yet again...

    Leave a comment:


  • Don1
    replied
    Originally posted by Maudib View Post
    I have my facts.. check to make sure you have yours.

    I have never had any argument with you regarding OLINT being a Ponzi scheme.

    Karrek yuhself yute.
    yes maasa.... mi sarry.


    whe di fax dem deh... mek wi seet.

    Leave a comment:


  • Muadib
    replied
    I have my facts.. check to make sure you have yours.

    I have never had any argument with you regarding OLINT being a Ponzi scheme.

    Karrek yuhself yute.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X