RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Information Minister slams Standard & Poor's

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Don1
    replied
    Originally posted by Maudib View Post
    lol !

    That's more like it DumbOne.. do not be afraid to show your true colors.. give up the pretense.. 'Yuh nuh fraid ah no gyal, no man' don't forget to beat your chest...

    LOL !!
    Mi nah preten...fiya bun chi chi!!

    LOL!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Muadib
    replied
    lol !

    That's more like it DumbOne.. do not be afraid to show your true colors.. give up the pretense.. 'Yuh nuh fraid ah no gyal, no man' don't forget to beat your chest...

    LOL !!

    Leave a comment:


  • Don1
    replied
    Originally posted by Gamma View Post
    i take your point ..... they should have "accepted his resignation" long ago, however, having not done so, and being at this stage of negotiations where he is an obstacle to the policy direction they want to take what should they do?

    continue with negotiations that are stymied from the get go?
    capitulate and go with what he wants?
    accept his resignation and start from there?
    I take your point.

    I just felt the timing was very unfortunate...pity we did not go into this with a solid front.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gamma
    replied
    i take your point ..... they should have "accepted his resignation" long ago, however, having not done so, and being at this stage of negotiations where he is an obstacle to the policy direction they want to take what should they do?

    continue with negotiations that are stymied from the get go?
    capitulate and go with what he wants?
    accept his resignation and start from there?

    Leave a comment:


  • Don1
    replied
    Originally posted by Maudib View Post
    DumbOne faithful to the disaffected comrade line..

    Even in the face of all historical evidence to the contrary...

    lol !
    gwaan guh look fi yuh man fassy....tap run afta mi post dem

    Leave a comment:


  • Yuttie
    replied
    yo mean dem see what who pay dem want to see? LOL

    Leave a comment:


  • Don1
    replied
    Originally posted by Lazie View Post
    Well, the parties involved don't have a problem. The IMF said the negotiations are ongoing. How you gonna stay on the outside and know whats happening? I think people mekking up noise because they want to do so. But hey ... gwaan duh unuh ting.

    Yes mi ah gwaan duh my ting....mi cyan think fi miself...tank yuh Jeezas

    Yuh gwaan duh your ting ah falla politician an tek evvyting dem seh as gospel.

    One foolish tician takes many peeple wid im.

    Leave a comment:


  • Muadib
    replied
    DumbOne faithful to the disaffected comrade line..

    Even in the face of all historical evidence to the contrary...

    lol !

    Leave a comment:


  • Lazie
    replied
    Originally posted by Don1 View Post
    I think the PM's reason for the firing is a smokescreen because I don't think the GOJ is 100% idiotic...only partially so.

    If it is indeed true that the guy was fired becuse of a pay package that they were aware of long ago....and fired in the middle of leading critical negotiations with the IMF...that would say to me that the GOJ is completely idiotic.

    The pay issue is used as a pretext for the dismissal....at a critical time.

    The real reason must be policy differences....that being the case he should have been fired lang lang time.
    Well, the parties involved don't have a problem. The IMF said the negotiations are ongoing. How you gonna stay on the outside and know whats happening? I think people mekking up noise because they want to do so. But hey ... gwaan duh unuh ting.

    Leave a comment:


  • Don1
    replied
    Originally posted by Lazie View Post
    Again, the IMF issued a release Monday night. As far as they're concerned the negotiations are still going on.

    According to the PM's presentation,

    "Apart from the modest concession on the payment for rent, the Governor has remained adamant that the Bank's contractual obligations to him must be met. In a letter to the Minister dated Friday October 30th prior to his dismissal he stated in bold type "If the pacta sunt servanta principle which governs the sanctity of contracts is to have any meaning, the contract which I have signed with the Minister in accordance with statute should be observed". The letter goes on to say "If the contract is not to be observed then I would think that the law should take its course".

    What Derrick needs to do is come out and dispute all the PM said. Omar admitted that the compensation was too high.


    Now, until Derrick come out and give another angle, what evidence you have that its smokescreen?
    I think the PM's reason for the firing is a smokescreen because I don't think the GOJ is 100% idiotic...only partially so.

    If it is indeed true that the guy was fired beacuse of a pay package that they were aware of long ago....and fired in the middle of leading critical negotiations with the IMF...that would say to me that the GOJ is completely idiotic.

    The pay issue is used as a pretext for the dismissal....at a critical time.

    The real reason must be policy differences....that being the case he should have been fired lang lang time.... NOT in the middle of negotiations.

    That's where the partial stupidity comes in....because of the ridiculous timing of the firing...which led to a ratings downgrade.
    Last edited by Don1; November 4, 2009, 03:24 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Willi
    replied
    Dem see what dem want to see...

    Leave a comment:


  • Lazie
    replied
    Originally posted by Don1 View Post
    My point is they would/should have known his positions before negotiations started....and if not agreeable to the GOJ ...he should have been dumped then....before the talks started.

    This nonsense about him being dumped because of his salary package is just that...NONSENSE...a smokescreen.

    It does get the public on their side though...those who can't think straight.
    Again, the IMF issued a release Monday night. As far as they're concerned the negotiations are still going on.

    According to the PM's presentation,

    "Apart from the modest concession on the payment for rent, the Governor has remained adamant that the Bank's contractual obligations to him must be met. In a letter to the Minister dated Friday October 30th prior to his dismissal he stated in bold type "If the pacta sunt servanta principle which governs the sanctity of contracts is to have any meaning, the contract which I have signed with the Minister in accordance with statute should be observed". The letter goes on to say "If the contract is not to be observed then I would think that the law should take its course".

    What Derrick needs to do is come out and dispute all the PM said. Omar admitted that the compensation was too high.

    Now, until Derrick come out and give another angle, what evidence you have that its smokescreen?

    Leave a comment:


  • Don1
    replied
    Originally posted by Willi View Post
    Huh,

    Latti or not, Jam is FAR from safe.

    THAT is the reality...farting around with personnel and signals is exactly the red herrings that we love to divert ourselves with.

    I guess my scarcasm was lost.

    Leave a comment:


  • Don1
    replied
    Originally posted by Gamma View Post
    the ONE plus is that it may tend to show the other side that you are serious, this depends on how the negotiations are going mind you.

    the question i would ask is this, if it is your CHIEF negotiator and he is advocating a policy that is at odds with your plan, what should you do?!! it seems that at the last there may have been some inflexibility.
    My point is they would/should have known his positions before negotiations started....and if not agreeable to the GOJ ...he should have been dumped then....before the talks started.

    This nonsense about him being dumped because of his salary package is just that...NONSENSE...a smokescreen.

    It does get the public on their side though...those who can't think straight.

    Leave a comment:


  • Don1
    replied
    Originally posted by Willi View Post
    Betta to botch it and force financial reckoning day.

    You seem to forget that we have been living a financial lie for 20+ years.

    Dolly house HAD to mash up, as it was destroying Jamaica.

    Claude Clarke talks sense.
    Unfortunately the dolly house is STILL mashing up Jamaica...unless you feel we are the road to progress.

    I don't believe we are on that road, we are lost!! ....the same nonsense obtains whether PNP or JLP is in power.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X