Dem nuh ready fi Drivah !

[Muadib]

Actually, the violating Jamaican Law is a real issue that Babylon haffi deal wid. I am surprised at their carelessness in this matter.. then again, anyting which di PNP stooges concoct usually end up in failure..

Yuh can ah try tek down a man like Dudus wid anyting less dan a bulletproof submission ?

[Lazie]

Lets be honest, "the violating jamaican law" is a smoke screen. He doesn't want to sign it because he knows the Jamaican state cannot deal with the after effects.

MissLondon, ever since I asked a question, I've been accused of defending criminality. However, I will ask it again, what if they are actually correct about the evidence being illegal? None of the experts here has considered that. The former AG was being interviewed and when the argument about the evidence was brought to his attention his get out of jail line was take it to the courts.

However, when there was a previous standoff with the US gov't and the previous admin, how was it handled?

[MissLondon]

Lets be honest, "the violating jamaican law" is a smoke screen. He doesn't want to sign it because he knows the Jamaican state cannot deal with the after effects.

[Muadib]

Dis reminds me of di hapless Republicans VS Bill Clinton..

Comrade dem used to tic-tac-toe... a Chess Master dem ah try trap.. if Babylon cyaan manage him how Sistah 'p" and Peter expec fi manage ?

lol !


"Christopher Coke is wanted for an alleged crime in the US for which he ought to be tried and the Government of Jamaica, consistent with its obligations under the Treaty, will do everything necessary to facilitate his extradition once it is done in accordance with the provisions of the Treaty and the laws of our country," the prime minister said.
The Jamaican Government has maintained that the US has acted in contravention of the Interception of Communications Act, arguing that evidence gathered by the US was illegally obtained.
"The Government maintains that the information presented in support of this particular request is unacceptable because it has been used in violation of Jamaican law and in contravention of the expressed order of a judge of the Supreme Court," Golding said, noting that from as far back as September of last year, the Government formally requested additional or separate information from the US authorities that would enable the minister to fulfil the request.
"We assured the US authorities that once this is done, the minister will sign the authorisation to proceed," Golding added.
Yesterday, under persistent questioning from Opposition Member of Parliament, Dr Peter Phillips who had first questioned the engagement of the US law firm in March this year, Prime Minister Golding sought refuge in Standing Order provisions governing the conduct of questions when asked why he had not admitted to being the one to 'sanction' persons within the party to seek legal representation in the first place.

"...Why didn't you say so then?" Phillips asked.

"The question I was asked was whether the Government of Jamaica had engaged the services of Manatt," Golding said emphatically, noting that he had answered what was asked of him at the time.
When Phillips continued to press he said: "There is a great deal of latitude, many courtesies extended in this House but the member ought to be aware that in Standing Order 16 he can only ask a question of a minister in his official capacity in relation to his portfolio responsibilities; you cannot ask in the House anything about my responsibilities as party leader."

Is wheh Babylon a wait pon ? Drivah put Dudus pon a platter.. all dem haffi duh is provide evidence without violating Jamaican Law.. ah really hope di PNP dem nuh eff up di plan wid dem 'tactics'