JLP's manifesto

[Lazie]

wow... that was my feeling as well... it is way too long... its like getting a class management group project and everyone in the group did their part independently and just lump them all together to make one document for presentation...

too long ... i guess ppl cyaan complain bout lack of details.

[Baddaz]

that could be good or bad... could find themselves constantly in an explanatory mode...

[Lazie]

that could be good or bad... could find themselves constantly in an explanatory mode...

... but nothing is wrong with that. If you read something that you're interested in and the details don't answer your questions, they have a right to explain it.

I had to laugh ... during the presentation of the PNP manifesto a journalist wanted to ask a question, PP shouted to Comrade Davis to come and deal with the questions .... Comrade Davies said .... "no ... next Thursday!!"

[Baddaz]

lazie, seriously the problem with these details, they lose effect upon examination because the details do not have a timeframe for accomplishment... its like just saying a lot of things, knowing that some people may want to hear all that you're saying but knowing that you can never deliver... and when challenged, you can always fallback and say it is being considered... put me in the 'not impressed' category... it takes more to trick me...

[Baddaz]

what is wrong with that... the document was just being presented... and even if the journalist was provided an advanced copy, they had time constraints and had allocated the Thursday for the Q&A session... that is standard practice...

lazie, dont major in the minor...

[Lazie]

lazie, seriously the problem with these details, they lose effect upon examination because the details do not have a timeframe for accomplishment... its like just saying a lot of things, knowing that some people may want to hear all that you're saying but knowing that you can never deliver... and when challenged, you can always fallback and say it is being considered... put me in the 'not impressed' category... it takes more to trick me...

Baddaz, there is no surprised you're not impressed. There are those whose objective is to find fault.

[Exile]

I make no excuses nor have any regrets on my comments to posters when ANY of our Jamaican women are being denigrated...Portia included. It is an shallow, backward, negative thing - especially by you and your ilk. Same thing has been said about fish market vendors and "I jumped" as you say. If you have no respect for your womenfolk - why do you want their votes? What careless talk I have been following?
You still don't know if have read the document so why are you saying this?

[Lazie]

what is wrong with that... the document was just being presented... and even if the journalist was provided an advanced copy, they had time constraints and had allocated the Thursday for the Q&A session... that is standard practice...

lazie, dont major in the minor...

LOL! I see yuh trying hard Baddaz. Comrade Davies was the chairman of the manifesto committee, so if he couldn't answer 1 question?

[Exile]

...while life goes on you got to stand strong, you can't surrender, no, no

[Lazie]

I make no excuses nor have any regrets on my comments to posters when ANY of our Jamaican women are being denigrated...Portia included. It is an shallow, backward, negative thing - especially by you and your ilk. Same thing has been said about fish market vendors and "I jumped" as you say. If you have no respect for your womenfolk - why do you want their votes? What careless talk I have been following?
You still don't know if have read the document so why are you saying this?

Exile ... you need to put down the sword and shield. Using sentimenal lines bout, "respect for womenfolk" don't have any standing in the matter.

The videos were all of Portia in action. Where was any of it not true? If it is shallow, backward and negative .... how the fornication is it anyone else's fault than the person committing the act? Put the comrade comprehension aside.

When Mosiah post the video of the J'can women was he or the person that put it on uchube were they being "shallow, backward, negative"

MAn find him woman a give him bun but waan beat up the man whey prove to him that him wife giving it away.

[Gamma]

yuh skip a part ... but is understandable!

[Baddaz]

lazie, were you impressed with the pnp's manifesto...

[Exile]

Yes, I am sentimental about women...I still have my mother alive, I have sisters, cousins, daughter etc. No excuses. Do you have a comprehension problem?....taking snippets of unrelated recordings out of their context and splicing them together to try to give a narrow perspective of a person takes some effort....hence the description as 'shallow, backward and negative". Now if that reasoning evades you, there is no point to go any further with this.

[Lazie]

lazie, were you impressed with the pnp's manifesto...

I never said I was impressed with anything. Their proposals on energy did catch my eye hence the regret that there was no energy debate.

[Lazie]

Yes, I am sentimental about women...I still have my mother alive, I have sisters, cousins, daughter etc. No excuses. Do you have a comprehension problem?....taking snippets of unrelated recordings out of their context and splicing them together to try to give a narrow perspective of a person takes some effort....hence the description as 'shallow, backward and negative". Now if that reasoning evades you, there is no point to go any further with this.

Yuh can twist all yuh want. Don't bring yuh mother and sisters into this to seek support for a ridiculous position. The videos were ALL PORTIA .... suh stop trying to find a way to blame others for her behaviour that you describe as 'shallow, backward and negative'.

You people seem to think everybody should quickly agree with unuh farcical position. I've never won any popularity contest ... so if unuh a form fool ... my back broad enuff fi tell unuh. Stop blaming others for Portia's poor behaviour.