RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

'Bang Belly' Economy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sir X
    replied
    Originally posted by Sir X View Post
    Thats where we differ , i see no shift in this PNP and JLP party , the shift happened from the 90s and since then its pot and kettle syndrome , they are both frauds , crooks and clueless , one is a well oiled deceptive robbing machine, one is an imploding robber.The ideological shift has been history from the 90s.
    Years without fears,I having been calling them out, can anyone else say the same. Now the JLP a get bun out , I am persona nongrata or a socialist !


    Mi naaaaah tap.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lazie
    replied
    Originally posted by Muadib View Post
    Had it on plate ?...suh nuh JLP set di plate ?

    Wheh dem tink China Harbour ah duh yah ?

    X must be being purposefully obtuse.. nuhbaddy cyaan fool suh..
    Huh .... have you met Mosiah?

    Leave a comment:


  • Assasin
    replied
    make X stay deh and gwaan talk. We never fail to give investors tax free status. You think anybody coming up with 8 billion and paying tax for a long time?

    However what we don't have is tax free holidays for Jamaicans except those who are politically connected. I can say I have done some research on this in the Atlanta and NY areas and in both places tax free status work well for inner city and some rural area development.

    Leave a comment:


  • Muadib
    replied
    Had it on plate ?...suh nuh JLP set di plate ?

    Wheh dem tink China Harbour ah duh yah ?

    X must be being purposefully obtuse.. nuhbaddy cyaan fool suh..

    Leave a comment:


  • Willi
    replied
    Taxable income??
    Is an $8B INVESTMENT and likely tax free holiday!

    Leave a comment:


  • Willi
    replied
    He clearly must know, because the last cabinet had it on their plate...

    Leave a comment:


  • Muadib
    replied
    Disingenuous.. the JLP has served 4 years since 1990.

    What is the basis of equating the two ?

    You sir are the fraud.

    Leave a comment:


  • Muadib
    replied
    You are truly an idiot.

    Who formulated the CEZ.. an integral part of the Logistics Hub proposal ?

    Twit.

    Leave a comment:


  • Muadib
    replied
    What would you like for him to say about the Ports ?

    You are the joker in the pack.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rockman
    replied
    Gosh poor me.
    But Bricktop,yuh caan eat your cake and have it.
    What you are actually saying it the JLP would undermine Jamaica to gain political points on the PNP?
    Gosh Poor Jamaica.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bricktop
    replied
    Originally posted by Rockman View Post
    We have come full circle to neck back,Audley is sounding like Manley.
    It is the JLP that holds true the capitalist mantra that Govt should just let things be,do not interfere with the private sector.
    The real importance of history is to not repeat mistakes.
    This is not the first time the JLP has said things echoing the same sentiments of the maligned Manley.Hopefully more to come.
    You are so clueless that you missed the point...Audley is "trolling" the PNP...

    The most essential part of trolling is convincing your victim that either a) truly believe in what you are saying, no matter how outrageous, or b) give your victim malicious instructions, under the guise of help.
    Trolling requires deceiving; any trolling that doesn't involve deceiving someone isn't trolling at all; it's just stupid. As such, your victim must not know that you are trolling; if he does, you are an unsuccessful troll.
    You have just been "owned" Rockhead...

    Owned

    v. owned, 0wned, pwned, 0wn3d, pwn3d, own3d.

    To be made a fool of; To make a fool of; To confound or prove wrong; embarrasing someone: Being embarrased.
    Last edited by Bricktop; April 24, 2013, 09:24 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sir X
    replied
    Damm I was holding it ...lol

    Leave a comment:


  • Lazie
    replied
    Originally posted by X View Post
    Wrong in what sense ? I admitted source and probability to exclusion in said article , you cant come up with anything to support your credibility.

    I dont think anything of myself , its just another comedic muse in the mawngings wid Sass (the knowledable and Lazie di Credible).

    Post source please...lol..still waiting.
    Well wait, don't hold yuh breath though.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sir X
    replied
    Wrong in what sense ? I admitted source and probability to exclusion in said article , you cant come up with anything to support your credibility.

    I dont think anything of myself , its just another comedic muse in the mawngings wid Sass (the knowledable and Lazie di Credible).

    Post source please...lol..still waiting.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lazie
    replied
    Originally posted by X View Post
    LOL..I expected that , I have no problem with my credibility .Its not for you to have a problem with it , I am sure Ben Laden didn have a problem with his or Bernie Madoff ..lol.
    ...well certainly you think alot of yourself if you think your opinion of my credibility bothers me. Because I pointed out you were wrong you want to question my credibility? Well, suit yuhself .... Shaw said nothing about the ports project as you call it.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X