RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mexican supreme court: Smoking Weed a Human Right?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mexican supreme court: Smoking Weed a Human Right?

    Is Smoking Weed a Human Right?
    Why the Mexican Supreme Court thinks the answer is yes


    A pro-marijuana rally outside the Mexican SenateTomas Bravo / Reuters

    SUBSCRIBE NOW >
    Sign up for
    The Atlantic Daily newsletter

    Email

    I want to receive updates from partners and sponsors.

    SIGN UP

    5.6k 163
    EDWARD DELMAN NOV 9, 2015
    Last week, just a day after voters in Ohio rejected a constitutional amendment to legalize the recreational and medical use of marijuana, Mexico’s Supreme Court headed in a different direction: The country’s top justices concluded that national laws making it illegal to personally produce, possess, and consume marijuana violated the rights of Mexicans. The ruling itself has received considerable attention, but the rationale behind it less so. The high court’s decision was based not on marijuana’s effects on public health or impact on incarceration rates, but on fundamental human rights. In that respect, it’s pretty precedent-setting globally.


    http://www.theatlantic.com/internati...-right/415017/
    THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

    "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


    "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

  • #2
    Gamma or anyone has the Jamaican courts every ruled in favor of ganja consumption on any basis.
    THERE IS ONLY ONE ONANDI LOWE!

    "Good things come out of the garrisons" after his daughter won the 100m Gold For Jamaica.


    "It therefore is useless and pointless, unless it is for share malice and victimisation to arrest and charge a 92-year-old man for such a simple offence. There is nothing morally wrong with this man smoking a spliff; the only thing wrong is that it is still on the law books," said Chevannes.

    Comment

    Working...
    X