RBSC

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Look like Beast haffi guh tek up di

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bricktop
    replied
    Ben will bring the salt...him argument have an excess...

    Leave a comment:


  • Rudi
    replied
    Hold on. Gotta get a popcorn refill.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bricktop
    replied
    woieee...mi belly...calculate the velocity and tell me whose is greater...Wolverine in mouth to rhattid...

    Leave a comment:


  • Muadib
    replied
    reaction time is not in any physics book I have seen showing the scientific method of calculating velocity..

    Is what school yuh seh yuh did guh again fi learn Physics ???

    Leave a comment:


  • Bricktop
    replied
    If my aunt was a man she would be my uncle...we nuh deal wit woulda...coulda...shoulda...his reaction time was what it was...good try though...

    Leave a comment:


  • Muadib
    replied
    It is incomplete.. the clock is tied to the starting block electronics.. try and guess why..

    No wonder your calculations are off...

    Try ah diffrant angle.. this spinning getting boring now..

    Leave a comment:


  • Bricktop
    replied
    I already provided IAAF clock times...yuh blind?

    Leave a comment:


  • Muadib
    replied
    Please provide IAAF clock times for input into the scientific formula for calculating velocity.

    I am not interested in your estimates... unless you are going to provide ambient temperature, humidity, track material, wind factor on the curve leg etc, etc..

    Lets get to a starting point of the velocity then we can hold a world forum to formulate probabilistic formulas to account for the other environmental factors to find someway to get Bolt out of second...

    Last edited by Muadib; August 19, 2013, 01:48 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bricktop
    replied
    I provided you a wind and altitude adjusted time...which for Blake is 19.31 and for Bolt is 19.18...you need to extricate your Wolverine from yuh mouth

    Leave a comment:


  • Muadib
    replied
    Please provide IAAF Clock data to substantiate this..

    Try ah next angle to extricate yuhself.. dis one flop !

    Leave a comment:


  • Bricktop
    replied
    The correct time is 19.31s...never said it was 19.26s

    Leave a comment:


  • Muadib
    replied
    19.26 seconds is not the correct time when using the scientific method to calculate speed over distance.

    Please avail yourself of the correct time data for this exercise before yuh step up inna big man argument...

    Now mi know seh yuh buy yuh Physics degree...

    Leave a comment:


  • Bricktop
    replied
    19.26s with +0.7 wind at 35m altitude running out of Lane 6 is 19.31s...hard data...

    Leave a comment:


  • Muadib
    replied
    You supplied an incorrect time for Blake... the time you provided contains data that distorts the scientific method used to calculate speed over distance..

    When you have the correct time let me know.. if you have trouble obtaining it please advise and I can assist.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bricktop
    replied
    All adjustments have been made...there are no "assumptions"...hard data is available to make the calculations...yuh Wolverine boot heel wear out
    Last edited by Bricktop; August 19, 2013, 12:43 PM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X