Luis Suarez in new cheat storm

[Gamma]

Too funny. Your brother as it turns out has been doing that for a while where we're you then to take a moral high road? Spare me your righteous indignation!

[Mosiah]

You didn't get it.

It's Queen! To make it funny!

[Mosiah]

Yuh woulden like know what me a hope fah!

[Peter R]

And what are you? yuh quick fi call people name and label, and while I may be hypocritical in sayiing this as I just called the refs "idiots" I take refuge in that I refer to a general collective, not people I interact with as in on this forum, no matter how much I disagree with their position...SMH

[Peter R]

I take back what I said about that particular ref as he is vindicated... my comment generally stands but in this case, the facts have been laid bare!

[Peter R]

Let the show begin.

Mi hope seh Suarez get t'ree man sen off and score a hat trick! LOL

[Peter R]

Paul,

I looked at that replay many times and I saw the player throw the ball and try to pull up Suarez but I did not realize that HE was who go the red... and not the "fouler".

I remember thinking how come him get whe? Anyway, the silence is deafening when the ones who are quick to call people names like 'hypercrite' dont have a effing toe fi stan pon... steeups!

[Peter R]

Tilla,

i am wondering where my parents went wrong with our upbringing because I am 100% behind Paul on saying that Suarez was shielding the ball. Tilla I know you are reasonable; you really need to check your analysis of that action by Suarez because if that is not shielding a ball then I don't know what is... the ONLY WAY the defender could get that ball would be to have run over Suarez like a bulldozer... it matters not what part of his body was in the way of the defender. How many times have you seen a defender hold off an attacker by blocking an attackers path to the ball and shepherding it out of play while NOT being in "possession" of the ball? regular ting.

If we are talking about the emoting on Suarez's part that's a different story but that ball was Suarez' s and his to protect.

We can break this down many ways but the undeniable fact is that the player made contact with Suarez from behind...knee or foot or whatever. Suarez's reaction to the contact is a whole different argument.

The Suarez hatred runs a lot deeper than I realized.

[Bruce]

Suarez' act against Peru is just the warmup. Uruguay's next World Cup match is at Quito, Ecuador. Ecuador and Uruguay are tied for fourth place and a direct ticket to Brazil with 22 points. However Uruguay is in fifth place (playoff) with a -4 goal difference to Ecuador.

[Paul Marin]

that is of some significance, if true and would mean that the ref did not fall for it. players should have to temper thier reaction to the reprobate though. he should start getting come cards for his theatrics ...

does it mean suarez is less of a reprobate? not really ..... he has a body of work that speaks for itself

Excuse me, (hypercrite)...the issue of Suarez being a reprobate is irrelevant. What is relevant is your INABILITY to bring yourself to say "I was wrong...his antics had nothing to do with the red card" as you have previously asserted. That is what is really at issue here. You accused the man of "causing" a red card through his antics; now that facts show that the red card was issued for something completely legitimate, you are still unable to acknowledge your mistake, let the accused go free, and suck it up. :shake_my_head: As I said before, when it comes to Suarez, all a unu brain get lick out...and unu have the cojones to call good upstanding people like me "hypercrite"...rather ironic I would say. LOL!!! Unu get xpose.

[Gamma]

that is of some significance, if true and would mean that the ref did not fall for it. players should have to temper thier reaction to the reprobate though. he should start getting come cards for his theatrics ...

does it mean suarez is less of a reprobate? not really ..... he has a body of work that speaks for itself

[Paul Marin]

It's probably a gene thing. Not my fault.

Hey, I'll wait until Suarez stabs someone. In self-defence, of course!

So what? If he stabs someone in self defense are you going to say it's his fault? I'm sure you will. Y'all have to let it go. You are beginning to look bitter.

[Paul Marin]

Paul, I agree I need help, but so do you. I mght add, you even do so more than me.

That said, I do not think I said that Suarez was shielding the ball. Shielding the ball is a perfectly legitimate play in the game. You shield the ball by putting your body between the ball and the next man when you have possession of the ball. What Suarez did was to block the man by putting his butt out in the man's way. The rest you know about so I will not go over it again.

Anyway Paul, this is my last pot on this matter. I do not think you are open to be convinced even with the best of evidence.

LOL!!! "Best of evidence" ... too funny. All now you can't admit sey the red card allegations you all had against Suarez were bogus...despite the evidence. Hilarious. Unu too wicked and bad mine. As for:

"What Suarez did was to block the man by putting his butt out in the man's way."

That is truly the most RIDICULOUS post I have seen in this forum EVER - and I include the entire works of Sir X in that tome as well. :unbelievable:

[Mosiah]

New rule, Tilla - players knees are not allowed to make contact with another player, no matter how slight the impact.

Even jacks has more contact than Paul Marin's football!

[Tilla]

Paul, I agree I need help, but so do you. I mght add, you even do so more than me.

That said, I do not think I said that Suarez was shielding the ball. Shielding the ball is a perfectly legitimate play in the game. You shield the ball by putting your body between the ball and the next man when you have possession of the ball. What Suarez did was to block the man by putting his butt out in the man's way. The rest you know about so I will not go over it again.

Anyway Paul, this is my last pot on this matter. I do not think you are open to be convinced even with the best of evidence.