RBSC
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bullead and his fan club destroyed: Chicken coming home to r
Collapse
X
-
that is X for you. Look at his posts two years ago on Butler, when others were saying to calm down and watch this man.
Leave a comment:
-
X yu speaking out of two sides... you are the biggest advocate of butler and wanted him to to be jff prez....... stop spinning.
Leave a comment:
-
Speculative on your part,being a negative Change agent doesn't mean their is injustice ! Because your candidate wasn't elected also doesn't mean there was Injustice!
The parish associations elected MR. Ricketts president under the same terms they had the opportunity to elect Stephenson.
Leave a comment:
-
That was in response to your assertions that a negative may result in a positive, it is a subtle reference to the other candidate would have otherwise been likely electable.
Leave a comment:
-
Where was justice delayed ? I agree with your statement in principle.
Leave a comment:
-
It is said that justice delayed is justice denied, Sir X.
The other candidate WAS viable.
A change denotes something new,and NOT a continuation , do we have that?
Leave a comment:
-
Ok...positive influence,is it not ( influence)😏. Brethren understand this competition is healthy and a change agent can be negative and cause a positive change.
Didn't I state this ?
Leave a comment:
-
Fine, I am alluding to positive influence.
Also,if by his inclusion circumvention resulted, then the process would have been better without him.
Leave a comment:
-
The mistake you and your president make is showing your bias in trying to discredit Bullead,he needs no help.
Another mistake you guys make is expecting (( sane)) people to follow your madness.
No influence yuh say and di man was a candidate,and he caused another to fall...lol.
Leave a comment:
-
And that what constitutes circumvention of the process, at least one other candidate was Butler-like, that candidate probably would have fared better had it not been for The agents overriding character flaws.
Leave a comment:
-
No evidence of influence but circumvention because of vitriol ,to cap it off Rickkets was elected because he was of the polar differences and then to conclude choosing someone dissmilar was a vote against (The Agent)
...I rest my case😏
Leave a comment:
-
Coaches accreditation, is that initiative the agent's or Tappa's?
Showcasing more local talents...the agent's or Tappa's?
Incidentally, if memory serves me right, Ricketts refused to present a manifesto yet he won,in actuality, there no evidence of the process being influenced by the agent.
If anything ,it was circumvented because of the ensuing vitriol ...
There are polar differences between Ricketts and The agent,and that is what made Ricketts electable.
The difference between staying the course or starting anew.
Choosing someone dissimilar was a vote against The Agent
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: